By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews — Maryland on the Map
When Governor Wes Moore announced Maryland’s plan to purchase Laurel Park for $48.5 million, he framed it as smart government — the state securing the last piece of its thoroughbred racing infrastructure, protecting jobs, anchoring the industry’s future. Another win for a governor who has made a habit of announcing wins.
That was two weeks ago.
This week, the state imposed a 45-day delay on the Laurel purchase to review the finances.
That doesn’t sound like a governor who is confident in his math.
A Pattern Maryland Should Recognize
Before Laurel Park, there was the farmland.
Maryland, in its ongoing effort to build a thoroughbred training center, purchased farmland for $4.5 million. The purchase was announced. The vision was laid out. And then someone apparently ran the actual numbers and discovered it would cost approximately $100 million to develop the land into a functional training facility. The Maryland Thoroughbred Racetrack Operating Authority, the agency responsible for the decision, was subsequently shut down for mismanaging it.
The state bought land it couldn’t afford to use. It announced a win. The win evaporated. The agency responsible was dissolved.
Now Maryland has announced a $48.5 million purchase of Laurel Park. And within two weeks of that announcement, the state has imposed a 45-day delay to go over the finances.
The pattern is not subtle.
This is not a state with a strong track record of announcing major racing infrastructure investments and then successfully executing them. The institutional memory of the MTROA failure should be informing every decision being made right now about Laurel Park and the $400 million Pimlico rebuild. It is not clear that it is.
It is also not a pattern unique to racing. Moore governs by announcement — the press release comes first, the homework comes later, and Maryland taxpayers are left holding the bill when the math doesn’t work. Racing has simply made that governing style unusually visible, because the failures are sequential, documented, and expensive enough to be impossible to ignore.
The Churchill Downs Problem
The Laurel delay would be concerning on its own. It becomes more concerning when you place it in the context of what has happened to Maryland’s racing investment thesis over the past several months.
Moore’s administration built the case for public investment in Maryland’s racing infrastructure on a coherent premise: the state owns the venues, the Preakness is a marquee national event, a modern rebuilt Pimlico anchors Baltimore’s Park Heights community, and year-round racing at a state-owned Laurel creates an economic engine that justifies the public dollars.
That premise had a quiet assumption baked into it: that the Preakness was Maryland’s to steward.
Then Churchill Downs Incorporated paid $85 million to 1/ST Racing for the intellectual property rights to the Preakness Stakes — the name, the trademark, the brand. Everything that makes the race worth housing. Moore’s office indicated the administration learned about the deal when the public did. Maryland went from being the steward of a 154-year-old race to being a landlord paying annual licensing fees to a Kentucky corporation for the right to use that race’s name at a building Maryland owns.
If Moore had known CDI was going to buy the Preakness IP before he committed to the Laurel purchase, it is a reasonable question whether the deal would have looked the same. The investment thesis depends on Maryland having meaningful leverage over its own racing future. That leverage is significantly diminished when the brand value of the Preakness belongs to Churchill Downs.
The Skip Problem
Compounding all of it: Golden Tempo, the 2026 Kentucky Derby winner, announced this week that he will bypass the Preakness Stakes. It is the third time in five years that a Derby winner’s connections have made that decision.
Churchill Downs owns the Derby. Churchill Downs now owns the Preakness. Churchill Downs profits when Derby winners remain healthy and go on to successful breeding careers. The company that controls both races has structural financial incentives that do not necessarily align with Maryland’s interest in having a Derby winner in the Preakness gate every May.
Maryland has no seat at that table. It has a building and a licensing agreement.
The Question Moore Hasn’t Answered
The 45-day Laurel delay is being framed as due diligence. Maybe it is. Reviewing the finances of a $48.5 million purchase before finalizing it is not inherently a red flag.
But the state’s track record with racing infrastructure announcements, the CDI acquisition that restructured Maryland’s leverage position, the ongoing pattern of Derby winners skipping the race Maryland is spending $400 million to house, and now a pause on the deal Moore announced as a win two weeks ago — taken together, these are not the signals of an investment that is going according to plan.
The question Wes Moore owes Maryland taxpayers is not whether he is reviewing the Laurel finances. It is whether the overall investment thesis — the one that justified $400 million in public bonds for Pimlico — still holds, given everything that has changed since that commitment was made.
Maryland bought into a vision. Churchill Downs bought the vision’s most valuable asset. And now the state is pausing to check the math on a deal it already announced.
That’s buyer’s remorse. The only question is whether anyone in Annapolis is willing to say so out loud.
Maryland on the Map is an ongoing MDBayNews series on the state’s sporting economy and public investment in major events.
Sources: on3.com; Cherie DeVaux Racing official statement; Churchill Downs Incorporated; Maryland Stadium Authority; Maryland Thoroughbred Racetrack Operating Authority; prior MDBayNews Maryland on the Map series reporting.
Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free
MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.
If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.
Have a tip or documents to share?
We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.
Discover more from Maryland Bay News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.