Baltimore’s ICE Holding Rooms: What Changed in 2025 — And Why Maryland Democrats Are Fighting New Facilities

By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews

For nearly a decade, the George H. Fallon Federal Office Building at 31 Hopkins Plaza has housed the Baltimore Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). That includes short-term “holding rooms” on the sixth floor — spaces designed for brief stays, typically under 12 hours, while individuals await processing, court appearances, or transfer to other facilities.

What it was not designed to be was a long-term detention center.

Yet since early 2025, those same holding rooms have become the focal point of one of Maryland’s most heated immigration battles.

What’s New — And What Isn’t

It is important to separate fact from politics.

The Fallon Building holding rooms were not created by President Trump. They have existed for years, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, primarily for short-term administrative processing.

What changed in January 2025 — at the start of Trump’s second term — was not the building itself, but how it was used.

With a nationwide surge in immigration enforcement and insufficient bed space elsewhere, ICE began holding individuals for extended periods in Baltimore — sometimes for days. By March 2025, local media outlets began reporting allegations of overcrowding and detainees sleeping on floors in rooms originally designed for five to 35 people.

Those reports sparked protests, congressional inquiries, and lawsuits. But the building itself — and ICE’s presence in it — predates the current administration.

Trump’s Strategy: Build Real Detention Capacity

Rather than rely on improvised holding conditions, the Trump administration has pursued a very different strategy in 2026: expand bed capacity with structured facilities designed for longer stays.

That includes the controversial purchase of an 825,000-square-foot warehouse in Washington County, near Hagerstown, intended to be converted into a large-scale detention and processing center capable of holding more than 1,500 individuals. Unlike the Fallon holding rooms, the proposed site would include beds, showers, food service areas, medical facilities, and recreational space.

In other words, it would be a purpose-built detention facility — not an office building pressed into extended use.

From a center-right perspective, the administration’s argument is straightforward:

If enforcement is going to happen, it should occur in facilities designed for it — not in makeshift holding rooms.

Democratic Resistance in Maryland

Maryland’s Democratic leadership has moved aggressively to block expansion.

Governor Wes Moore and much of the state’s congressional delegation have opposed the Washington County facility. Local governments in places like Howard County have passed emergency legislation blocking private detention centers outright. And the General Assembly has passed bills aimed at ending local cooperation agreements with ICE (287(g) agreements), further limiting in-state detention options.

Opponents argue the facilities would be harmful to communities, insufficiently transparent, or fundamentally tied to enforcement policies they oppose. Supporters argue the resistance is less about conditions and more about rejecting federal immigration enforcement altogether.

The result: Maryland remains a state with no major dedicated ICE detention center — meaning detainees are often transported out of state to Virginia, Pennsylvania, or farther south.

The Political Irony

Here’s the tension that rarely gets acknowledged:

• Critics condemn the extended holding conditions in Baltimore.
• The administration proposes building facilities with beds and proper infrastructure.
• State Democrats block those facilities.
• Overcrowding in temporary holding rooms continues.

Whether one supports or opposes Trump’s enforcement policies, it is difficult to ignore that Maryland’s political leadership is resisting the construction of facilities that would replace improvised arrangements with structured ones.

That doesn’t mean every proposal deserves approval. Zoning, community impact, and oversight all matter. But the debate is not simply about “humane vs. inhumane.” It is about whether immigration detention should expand at all.

The Broader National Context

Under both the Obama and Biden administrations, extended immigration detention was common nationwide — often through private prisons and county jails in the South and Southwest. Maryland largely avoided becoming a hub for long-term detention during those years.

Trump’s second-term strategy differs in scale and decentralization. Rather than rely exclusively on existing Southern detention networks, the administration appears to be building capacity closer to where enforcement actions occur.

Maryland, as a blue state with strong sanctuary-style policies, is now ground zero for that clash.

Where Things Stand Now

As of February 2026:

• The Fallon Building continues to house ICE’s Baltimore Field Office.
• Extended use of its holding rooms has drawn ongoing scrutiny.
• The proposed Washington County facility remains in planning stages amid legal and political resistance.
• State legislation limiting cooperation with ICE is advancing.

The central question facing Maryland voters is no longer whether immigration enforcement will occur. It is whether enforcement will occur in facilities designed for extended detention — or in temporary rooms never meant for it.

In a state where political leadership overwhelmingly opposes federal immigration policy, the fight is not just about beds or buildings.

It is about control — and who ultimately decides how federal law is enforced within Maryland’s borders.

---

Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free

MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.

If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.

👉 Support Local Journalism

Have a tip or documents to share?

We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.

 👉 Submit a Tip