Homicides Are Down in Maryland — Parsing the Credit, the Data, and the GOP View

By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews

Homicides are falling across the United States at a pace few would have predicted in the aftermath of the pandemic. That is not spin — it is borne out by national, state, and local data. The harder question, especially in a political year, is why the numbers fell and who deserves credit.

In Maryland, where Baltimore historically drives a large share of the state’s violence, those questions are now front and center.

The National Backdrop: A Powerful Tailwind

Nationally, homicide declines have been dramatic:

• 2024: roughly 13–15% drop nationwide
• 2025: roughly 20%, the largest single-year decline on record

That context matters. Republicans consistently note that similar declines occurred in cities and states with very different leadership and crime policies. From a center-right perspective, any analysis that ignores this national normalization risks overstating local political success.

Baltimore’s Numbers: Hard to Dismiss

Baltimore’s drop, however, stands out even against that backdrop.

Baltimore City homicides

Year	Homicides	Change	Notes
2015	344	—	Post-Freddie Gray spike
2023	261	−20%	First sustained decline
2024	~201	−23%	Lowest since 2011
2025	133	−34%	Lowest in ~50 years

That represents roughly a 60% reduction from the 2015 peak, alongside steep drops in non-fatal shootings, robberies, and carjackings.

Maryland Statewide: Improvement, Driven by Baltimore

Statewide trends are more modest but still meaningful:

• Cumulative decline since 2021: ~32%
• 2025 total: ~478 homicides (down ~9% from the prior year)

Baltimore often accounts for 50–60% of Maryland’s homicides in a given year, meaning the city’s performance heavily shapes statewide outcomes — a point Republicans frequently emphasize when statewide figures are cited as proof of broad policy success.

Brandon Scott: Where Evidence Matters

Mayor Brandon Scott has overseen Baltimore’s most sustained homicide reduction in decades. The centerpiece of his approach — the Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS) — is one reason some center-right analysts have softened their skepticism.

GVRS is not a symbolic program. Independent evaluation matters here:

• University of Pennsylvania analysis found 25–33% reductions in homicides and shootings in pilot districts
• No displacement of crime to surrounding areas
• Clearance rates climbed to roughly 68% in 2024, disrupting retaliation cycles
• Expansion from one district to five by mid-2025

For law-and-order conservatives, the key distinction is that GVRS combines targeted enforcement, direct deterrence, and accountability — not blanket de-policing.

Republicans may not praise the “public health” framing, but many quietly acknowledge that Baltimore’s decline is too large and too well-documented to dismiss.

Prosecutors and Policing: A Missing Piece Often Ignored

Another factor often cited by conservatives is prosecutorial change.

Baltimore State’s Attorney Ivan Bates, elected in 2022, reversed several policies associated with his predecessor and emphasized charging violent repeat offenders. Law-and-order voices argue that improved cooperation between prosecutors and police — alongside higher clearance rates — reinforced deterrence in ways often overlooked in political messaging.

This fits more comfortably with Republican instincts: focused enforcement over ideology.

Wes Moore: Supportive, Not Central

Governor Wes Moore took office in 2023 and has highlighted statewide crime declines while partnering closely with Baltimore leadership.

His administration’s role has included:

• Enhanced coordination via the Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center
• Targeted State Police and Transportation Authority deployments
• Investments in victim services, youth initiatives, and gun-trafficking interdiction

Republicans generally view Moore’s contribution as supportive rather than causal. Baltimore’s steepest declines align more closely with GVRS expansion, prosecutorial shifts, and improved clearance rates than with new statewide policy frameworks.

How Republicans Actually View the Drop

Contrary to some narratives, Maryland Republicans have not mounted an aggressive backlash against the crime data. The reaction has been more restrained:

• Relief: fewer murders are unequivocally good news
• Skepticism: Democrats risk over-crediting themselves for a national trend
• Caution: crime declines are volatile and easily reversed

Rather than attacking Scott or Moore directly, Republicans tend to stress durability:

A real test is whether these gains survive economic stress, funding cuts, or political turnover.

The Center-Right Bottom Line

A clear-eyed assessment yields this:

• National trends created the opening
• Baltimore’s targeted, data-driven strategies produced outsized gains
• State support helped reinforce — not originate — the decline

For Republicans, the lesson is not to deny success but to insist on precision, humility, and sustainability. Celebrating fewer murders is appropriate. Declaring the problem solved is not.

If Maryland continues funding proven elements — focused deterrence, strong prosecution, and high clearance rates — the gains may last. If politics overtakes evidence, history suggests the numbers can climb just as fast as they fell.

---

Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free

MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.

If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.

👉 Support Local Journalism

Have a tip or documents to share?

We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.

 👉 Submit a Tip