Green Party Candidate Says MPT Chairman’s Donations to Moore Raise Conflict of Interest Questions

Andy Ellis points to $12,000 in giving by the Maryland Public Broadcasting Commission chairman and his wife as he pushes to get into the October governor’s debate

By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews

---

BALTIMORE, Md. — Green Party gubernatorial candidate Andy Ellis is accusing the head of the state body that oversees Maryland Public Television of a conflict of interest, saying the chairman and his wife have given the maximum allowed under state law to Gov. Wes Moore’s re-election campaign while MPT keeps Ellis off its debate stage.

Ellis released the claim Wednesday during a livestream, then followed up Thursday with a formal statement from his campaign. According to figures the campaign says it pulled from the state’s online campaign finance database, Richard Bodorff and his wife, Ellen, have each given the $6,000 maximum an individual may contribute to a candidate under Maryland law during a four-year election cycle. The campaign dates Richard’s contribution to Nov. 21, 2024, and says Ellen’s giving began in April 2025. MDBayNews could not independently query the state’s campaign finance portal, which blocks automated searches, but the $6,000 figures align with Maryland’s published contribution limit and with how other maxed-out donors to Moore have been reported by other outlets this cycle.

Bodorff has chaired the Maryland Public Broadcasting Commission, MPT’s governing board and FCC license holder, since July 1, 2025. Moore elevated him to the post that June after Bodorff spent five years as vice chair, a role to which he was originally appointed in 2020 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan. Bodorff is also a longtime communications attorney at the Washington firm Wiley Rein and has separately chaired the MPT Foundation, the network’s nonprofit fundraising arm.

MPT is scheduled to host a debate between Moore and Republican nominee Dan Cox on Oct. 6. Ellis and Working Class Party candidate Cathy White, both of whom qualified for the November ballot, have not been invited.

“MPT’s inconsistent debate-invitation policy clearly advantages Governor Moore.”

“MPT’s inconsistent debate-invitation policy clearly advantages Governor Moore,” Ellis said in the campaign’s release.

What MPT’s own policy says

“Polling isn’t the only path.”

MDBayNews reviewed MPT’s written editorial standards, obtained through a Maryland Public Information Act request, along with roughly 90 pages of internal staff correspondence about debate eligibility going back to 2018. The documents show MPT’s criteria are not simply “Republican vs. Democrat,” as Ellis’s release suggests, but they do give the network’s editorial staff broad discretion:

• A candidate must be legally qualified for the ballot and actively campaigning statewide.
• A candidate is deemed a “significant candidacy” if he or she polls at least 10 percent in a reliable, nonpartisan general election survey.
• Polling isn’t the only path: the same policy lists prior votes won in a statewide or countywide office, media coverage, financial resources, and campaign strength as other evidence of “significant voter interest.”

That discretion has drawn complaints before. A 2022 petition organized after MPT excluded three of five gubernatorial candidates from that year’s debate argued the network’s polling threshold was effectively meaningless because MPT had already decided who would appear before any qualifying poll was published. A Libertarian candidate that year threatened to bring the dispute to the commission itself, internal emails show. The following year, MPT staff privately discussed rewriting the policy to spell out that a panel of journalists would pick participants whenever no qualifying poll existed, but shelved the idea after the network’s legal team noted a court had already dismissed a challenge to the existing criteria and advised against reopening it.

“The network’s board, however, is appointed entirely by the governor.”

Not Ellis’s first complaint

Ellis has pressed MPT on this issue for months. In July he called for a four-candidate series of debates across the state, and after Cox agreed to an MPT-hosted matchup with Moore this fall, Ellis asked why data centers, a top issue in his campaign, couldn’t be debated by all four tickets on the ballot. His campaign has run a petition drive at gogreen2026.com/debate since at least July, and Wednesday’s donation disclosure is the latest push behind it. A campaign graphic promoting the petition calls on MPT to open the October debate to “ALL ballot-qualified candidates.”

“Wednesday’s donation disclosure is the latest push behind it.”

MPT’s published debate guidelines state the network works to shield its editorial decisions “from improper political pressure or influence from program funders or other sources.” The network’s board, however, is appointed entirely by the governor, a structural fact that has fueled third-party frustration with MPT since well before Moore took office.

Ellis and running mate Owen Silverman Andrews are running on a platform that includes campaign finance reform and an end to Maryland’s two-party “duopoly.” The campaign says it accepts no corporate or PAC money.

What to watch

• Whether MPT responds publicly to Ellis’s petition before the Oct. 6 debate.
• Whether the Bodorffs’ donation history draws scrutiny from other candidates on the ballot, including Cox.
• Whether Maryland lawmakers revisit MPT governance, given that the governor appoints all 11 commission members and names the chair.

---

Sources: This article draws on a Sept. 17, 2026, press release and prior statements and campaign graphics from the Andy Ellis for Governor campaign (gogreen2026.com), including releases dated Jan. 4, July 5 and July 27, 2026; Wiley Rein LLP’s June 23, 2025, announcement of Richard Bodorff’s appointment as chair of the Maryland Public Broadcasting Commission; a June 16, 2025, MPT announcement of the same; a January 2023 MPT announcement of Bodorff’s election as chair of the MPT Foundation; a 2020 Talbot Spy report on Bodorff’s original appointment to the commission by then-Gov. Larry Hogan; Maryland Matters’ and States Newsroom’s reporting on the Oct. 6 Moore-Cox debate; a 2022 Change.org petition regarding MPT’s debate exclusions; the Maryland Education Article governing the Public Broadcasting Commission’s composition; and MPT editorial policy records and internal staff correspondence obtained by MDBayNews through a Maryland Public Information Act request. Maryland’s $6,000 individual contribution limit is drawn from state election law as reported by Bisnow and Maryland Matters in prior campaign finance coverage. MDBayNews was unable to independently query the Maryland State Board of Elections’ online campaign finance database, which blocks automated access, to confirm the exact contribution dates cited by the Ellis campaign.