When Classrooms Become Campaign Headquarters, Parents Should Push Back

By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews | Opinion

There is a line between teaching students how to think and telling them what to think. Increasingly, in Maryland and across the country, that line is being erased.

When teachers take elementary or middle school students out of class to participate in political protests — particularly during instructional hours — they are not engaging in civic education. They are engaging in political activism using captive minors and taxpayer-funded time.

And if they are also using school resources, materials, and classroom hours to make protest signs, the issue moves from questionable judgment to serious professional misconduct.

Education or Activism?

Public schools exist to educate. Parents send their children to school to learn math, reading, science, history — not to serve as props in adult political disputes.

Students have First Amendment rights. But minors in compulsory attendance environments are not autonomous political actors in the same way adults are. When a teacher organizes, directs, or facilitates student participation in a political protest during school hours, it raises several serious concerns:

• Was parental consent obtained?
• Were students given a genuine choice not to participate?
• Were alternative academic activities provided?
• Were public funds and materials used for partisan messaging?
• Did administrators approve the activity?

If the answer to those questions is unclear — or worse, “no” — accountability is warranted.

The Consent Problem

Field trips typically require written parental permission. Why? Because schools recognize that removing children from the classroom carries legal and safety implications.

A political protest is not a museum visit. It is not a science fair. It is inherently expressive and potentially controversial. If students were transported, supervised, or encouraged to attend without written consent, parents have every reason to be alarmed.

Even if students walked out voluntarily, the question becomes whether teachers encouraged or organized the action. There is a profound difference between students independently expressing political views and authority figures shepherding them into a cause.

The Resource Misuse Issue

If school time was used to create protest signage — poster board, markers, printers, classroom instruction time — then taxpayers effectively subsidized political advocacy.

That is not what public education funding is for.

Marylanders already face rising education costs and uneven academic performance. Literacy and math scores have not rebounded to pre-pandemic levels in many districts. Chronic absenteeism remains elevated. Parents are struggling with learning loss.

In that context, dedicating instructional hours to political mobilization is indefensible.

Indoctrination vs. Instruction

Civic education should teach students how government works, how laws are made, and how to evaluate competing viewpoints. It should not steer them toward a predetermined political position.

When children — especially elementary and middle school students — are guided into political demonstrations, it risks turning classrooms into ideological training grounds rather than places of open inquiry.

Maryland families are politically diverse. Schools serve Republicans, Democrats, independents, immigrants, military families, religious households, and secular ones. Teachers are public employees, not political operatives.

Parents do not surrender their authority or their children’s political formation when they drop them off at school.

Legal and Policy Accountability

Parents who believe their children were used for political activism during school hours should consider several actions:

1. Request documentation under Maryland Public Information Act laws regarding planning, emails, and resource use.
2. Demand copies of any consent forms distributed — or confirmation that none were.
3. Raise the issue at Board of Education meetings.
4. File formal complaints with the district.
5. Consult legal counsel regarding potential misuse of public resources or violations of district policy.

Teachers and administrators operate under codes of professional conduct. Those codes generally prohibit using classroom authority for partisan political purposes.

If that line was crossed, consequences should follow — not as punishment for personal beliefs, but as enforcement of professional boundaries.

The Bigger Picture

This is not about suppressing speech. Students can protest after school. Families can bring their children to rallies. High schoolers can organize independently within established school guidelines.

But instructional time is not campaign time.

Maryland’s education system should be laser-focused on academic excellence, not ideological spectacle. The public’s trust in schools depends on neutrality, professionalism, and respect for parental authority.

If schools become staging grounds for political causes — regardless of the cause — families will increasingly seek alternatives.

And that is a long-term loss for everyone.

Public education works only when parents believe schools are educating, not indoctrinating.

When that trust is broken, accountability is not optional.

---

Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free

MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.

If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.

👉 Support Local Journalism

Have a tip or documents to share?

We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.

 👉 Submit a Tip