By MDBayNews Staff
A former senior official at the Baltimore Department of Public Works has filed a federal lawsuit against the City of Baltimore, alleging she was fired in retaliation for raising concerns about racial discrimination inside the agency.
The plaintiff, Linda Batts, was hired in 2019 as DPW’s first-ever Director of Equity, a role created during the city’s broader push toward internal equity initiatives. According to reporting by FOX Baltimore and CBS News Baltimore, Batts claims she was terminated in March 2021 after reporting what she describes as systemic discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment across multiple DPW divisions.
The lawsuit has been filed in federal court and is still in its early stages. No findings of fact have been made.
Serious Allegations, Strong Language
According to the complaint, Batts says she received reports from employees in several DPW units — including Water & Wastewater and Solid Waste — describing workplace conditions she characterized as “severely hostile and retaliatory,” using language comparing the environment to a “pre-emancipation, colonial plantation-type” setting.
Batts alleges that employees who raised concerns faced retaliation and that her own efforts to address these issues internally led to her dismissal.
Her attorney, Thiru Vignarajah, has stated that Batts received a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and argues the case reflects deeper, long-standing problems within DPW’s leadership and culture.
A representative of AFSCME Local 44, which represents many DPW workers, has publicly expressed support for Batts, saying her claims align with complaints the union has heard over time.
Allegations Are Not Findings — Due Process Still Matters
Claims of discrimination and retaliation deserve serious scrutiny. If proven, retaliation against a senior equity official would represent a significant failure of leadership and internal oversight.
At the same time, allegations — even strongly worded ones — are not evidence. Baltimore has seen repeated cases where serious claims are announced through lawsuits or press conferences long before the facts are tested in court.
A fair system requires both:
- Protection for whistleblowers who raise legitimate concerns
- Evidence-based adjudication before conclusions are drawn
The proper venue for resolving those questions is federal court, not social media or political pressure.
A Broader Pattern of Internal Breakdown
Regardless of how the lawsuit ultimately resolves, the case highlights a persistent problem in Baltimore governance: major internal disputes routinely escalate to litigation, suggesting that internal reporting and resolution mechanisms are either ineffective or not trusted.
DPW, in particular, has faced years of criticism over management practices, workplace safety, and oversight — including scrutiny following the heat-related death of DPW worker Ronald Silver, which Batts’ legal team referenced as part of broader concerns she says were ignored.
For taxpayers, the issue is not ideology but governance: problems should be identified and corrected internally, before they become multimillion-dollar legal liabilities.
City Response Remains Limited
The City of Baltimore and DPW have issued a brief statement affirming their commitment to equity, inclusion, and compliance with the law, but declined to address the specific allegations, citing pending litigation.
That response may be legally prudent, but it does little to reassure the public that strong internal safeguards exist — either to prevent discrimination or to protect employees who report it.
What Happens Next
The case will proceed through federal court, where evidence, documents, and testimony will determine whether Batts’ termination was unlawful retaliation or a lawful personnel decision.
Until then, both the plaintiff and the city are entitled to due process.
But Baltimore residents are entitled to something more immediate: clearer transparency about how city agencies handle internal complaints — and why so many of them end up before a judge instead of being resolved internally.
Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free
MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.
If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.
Have a tip or documents to share?
We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.
Discover more from Maryland Bay News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.