By MDBayNews Staff
A new claim from the Maryland Freedom Caucus is reigniting Maryland’s ongoing voter data dispute, raising fresh questions about transparency, consistency, and who gets access to sensitive election records.
In a post labeled “BREAKING,” the caucus says Jared DeMarinis, Administrator of the Maryland State Board of Elections, confirmed during a recent briefing that Maryland already shares unredacted voter registration data with 21 other states through the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC)—the same system used for interstate voter roll maintenance.
At the same time, DeMarinis has continued to resist providing similar unredacted data to the U.S. Department of Justice, citing state privacy laws and limits on federal access. That distinction is now at the center of an active federal lawsuit.
What DeMarinis Confirmed
According to video shared by the Freedom Caucus, DeMarinis acknowledged that Maryland submits full voter registration data—including sensitive identifiers—to ERIC, where it is matched and shared with other member states for election administration purposes.
ERIC is designed to help states identify:
- Voters who moved across state lines
- Duplicate registrations
- Deceased registrants
- Address changes and list maintenance issues
Maryland has been a member since ERIC’s founding in 2012 and remains active today.
The administrator’s position is that Maryland law explicitly authorizes interstate sharing through ERIC, but does not permit the same data to be handed directly to federal agencies outside that framework.
The DOJ Lawsuit Behind the Dispute
The controversy traces back to a 2025 demand by the DOJ for Maryland’s complete, unredacted statewide voter registration database. Federal officials argued the request was necessary to enforce laws such as the National Voter Registration Act and to review voter roll accuracy nationwide.
DeMarinis refused, offering only redacted or publicly available versions of the data and warning that broader federal access could undermine voter privacy and public confidence. By late 2025, the DOJ filed suit in federal court, asserting authority under the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to obtain the records.
That case remains unresolved.
Why Conservatives Are Crying Foul
For the Maryland Freedom Caucus and other critics, the issue isn’t ERIC itself—it’s the selective logic.
If Maryland can legally and securely share full voter data with a multi-state consortium, they argue, it’s difficult to explain why the same data is off-limits to federal investigators charged with enforcing election law.
To them, the distinction looks less like privacy protection and more like political discretion—especially as the state resists oversight from a federal administration aligned with Republican election-integrity priorities.
Supporters Push Back
Election officials and civil-rights groups counter that the comparison is flawed.
ERIC, they argue, is a member-run, limited-purpose system created specifically for list maintenance—not a general federal database. Data shared through ERIC stays within the network and is governed by strict bylaws and state participation agreements.
By contrast, opponents of the DOJ request fear that a national voter database could be used for broader enforcement, data-sharing with other agencies, or voter intimidation—concerns amplified in the post-2024 political climate.
The Bigger Question for Maryland
At the heart of the dispute is a simple but unresolved issue:
Who decides when election transparency becomes overreach—and who gets to draw that line?
As the lawsuit moves forward, Maryland voters are left watching a legal standoff that pits state autonomy against federal oversight, privacy protections against audit authority, and two very different visions of election integrity.
Whether DeMarinis’ ERIC admission strengthens the DOJ’s case—or simply underscores the complexity of election law—will ultimately be decided in court.
But politically, the contradiction highlighted by the Freedom Caucus is unlikely to fade anytime soon.
What the Law Says
Maryland Election Law – State Authority Over Voter Data
Maryland’s statewide voter registration list is governed by the Maryland Election Law Article, primarily Title 3.
- Md. Election Law § 3-506(a)
The State Board of Elections is required to maintain a single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list. - Md. Election Law § 3-506(b)
The State Administrator may obtain and use information from any governmental or other source to maintain the accuracy of the statewide voter registration list. - Md. Election Law § 3-506(c)
Access to voter registration data is limited. Certain identifying information (such as full Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and dates of birth) is not subject to public disclosure except as specifically authorized by law.
Interstate Data Sharing for Election Administration
- Maryland law permits the State Board of Elections to participate in interstate voter registration list maintenance programs for official election administration purposes.
- Participation in ERIC is authorized as a state-to-state data-sharing arrangement designed to comply with federal requirements under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).
Federal Requests and State Law Limits
- Maryland election statutes do not expressly authorize blanket disclosure of the full, unredacted statewide voter registration database to federal agencies outside the state-administered election framework.
- State officials argue that any such disclosure must:
- Serve a clearly defined election-related purpose, and
- Comply with Maryland privacy protections and disclosure limits.
Federal Law Cited in DOJ Lawsuit
- The U.S. Department of Justice relies on 52 U.S.C. § 20701 (Civil Rights Act of 1960), which allows the Attorney General to demand access to election records for federal civil rights enforcement.
- Whether this federal authority overrides Maryland’s disclosure limits is the central legal question now before federal court.
Bottom Line
Maryland law clearly authorizes interstate voter data sharing for list maintenance through programs like ERIC.
Whether that same data must also be disclosed to the federal government under federal law is unsettled and currently being litigated.
Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free
MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.
If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.
Have a tip or documents to share?
We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.
Discover more from Maryland Bay News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.