Independent Review Affirms State’s Attorney’s Decision to End MONSE Partnership Over Constitutional Concerns

By MDBayNews Staff

An independent legal review has affirmed the decision by the Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office to terminate formal coordination with the Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement (MONSE), concluding that the move was lawful, justified, and necessary to protect defendants’ constitutional rights.

The finding undercuts claims that the termination was politically motivated or retaliatory and instead frames the decision as a matter of prosecutorial integrity and compliance with constitutional discovery obligations.

What MONSE Does — and Why the Distinction Matters

MONSE is a Baltimore City government agency operating under the Mayor’s Office. It coordinates non-police strategies to reduce violence, working with residents, nonprofits, and other agencies on initiatives such as violence interruption, victim services, and reentry support.

The office frames violence as a public-health issue, emphasizing prevention and community investment rather than enforcement alone. That role, however, places MONSE in close proximity to individuals who may later become criminal defendants, witnesses, or victims—raising legal complexities when information gathered outside traditional law-enforcement channels intersects with criminal prosecutions.

Why the State’s Attorney Ended the Partnership

In late 2025, Baltimore City State’s Attorney Ivan Bates announced that his office would end formal coordination with MONSE for certain programs, including the Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS) and aspects of victim-services collaboration.

Bates cited concerns that MONSE could possess information relevant to criminal cases—including potential exculpatory or impeachment material—that was not always being shared fully or in a timely manner with prosecutors. Such gaps, he warned, could expose cases to constitutional challenges, jeopardize convictions, and violate defendants’ due-process rights.

Findings of the Independent Legal Review

The independent legal review, conducted by outside counsel with no prior involvement in the dispute, agreed with that assessment.

The review concluded that because MONSE may hold information imputable to the State for constitutional discovery purposes, prosecutors face only two lawful options: ensure full and reliable access to that information, or terminate the formal partnership. Without guaranteed access, continuing coordination would risk violating established discovery obligations and undermining the integrity of prosecutions.

The review emphasized that the issue was not ideological disagreement over violence-prevention policy, but compliance with constitutional requirements governing criminal cases.

Prosecutorial Independence and Separation of Powers

From a center-right perspective, the episode underscores an often-ignored reality: State’s Attorneys are independent constitutional officers, not extensions of a mayor’s policy agenda. Partnerships with executive-branch agencies may be beneficial, but they remain voluntary—and must yield when constitutional duties are implicated.

Critics framed the termination as a setback for community-based violence prevention. The independent review, however, makes clear that protecting civil liberties and ensuring fair trials is not optional, even when popular programs are involved.

Why This Matters for Maryland

Maryland’s criminal justice system is under increasing strain—from staffing shortages to rising scrutiny of prosecutorial practices. In that environment, constitutional shortcuts are not a luxury prosecutors can afford.

The independent review closes the door on claims that the State’s Attorney’s Office acted unlawfully or improperly. It affirms a narrower but critical principle: no partnership, however well-intentioned, can supersede defendants’ constitutional rights.

Policy debates over how best to reduce violence will continue. But this review confirms that, in this case, the rule of law—not politics—guided the decision.

---

Keep MDBayNews Reporting Free

MDBayNews exists to help Marylanders understand decisions made by state and local leaders — especially when those decisions affect daily life, rights, and public services.

If this article helped clarify what’s happening or why it matters, reader support makes it possible to keep publishing clear, independent reporting like this.

👉 Support Local Journalism

Have a tip or documents to share?

We review submissions carefully and confidentially. Anonymous tips are welcome when appropriate.

 👉 Submit a Tip